Magnetic Fire is a community for mature gay men

Subscribe

The Validity of “Sexual Addiction”

Wednesday, March 10, 2010
posted by Loren A. Olson M.D.

I suppose it’s necessary to address the issue of sexual addiction since it is occuring so much in the media. Here is a link to a Night-Line report called, “Is Sexual Addiction Real?”

alg_tiger_woods

We live in a society where we are bombarded with expressions of sexuality while at the same time we hear other messages telling us that we must always have it under control. This blog post was originally published on Medscape Blogs:

The Validity of “Sexual Addiction”: Chasing a Tiger by Nassir Ghaemi, MD, Psychiatry/Mental Health, 03:17PM Feb 6, 2010

Nassir Ghaemi, MD, MPH, is Professor of Psychiatry at Tufts University School of Medicine and Director of the Mood Disorders and Psychopharmacology Programs at Tufts Medical Center.

Everyone is writing about Tiger Woods, and I am not at all inclined to join in – but I suppose I will. The casual use of the concept of “sexual addiction” in relation to his recent diagnosis and treatment may warrant some internal dialogue among psychiatrists. I write these notes not to persuade but to raise questions and see if other colleagues are not wondering similarly.

What is sex addiction all about? I understand hypersexuality, and I understand addiction, but I am not sure I understand sex addiction.

As a psychiatrist, I would first want to apply here the concept of a hierarchy of diagnoses. So a high amount of sexual activity could certainly occur with many conditions, and the concept of a sex addiction, if valid, would have to be the last thing one would diagnose – a diagnosis of exclusion since it could happen with so many other things.

phpThumb_generated_thumbnailjpg

First on everyone’s list of causes of high sexual activity, I would think, should be mania, or bipolar disorder. Next, or right with it, would be obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), with sexual content; this is quite common. Then perhaps PTSD with sexual trauma (with later hypersexuality in some people), substance abuse (e.g., amphetamine, steroid, or testosterone abuse), and frontal lobe syndrome. Some depressed individuals also appear to engage in sexual activity, not because of aroused libido, but out of a wish to come out of their isolation and engage with others, even if only physically.

Sexual addiction, as a concept, though, would seem to represent nothing but sex: no mania, nor PTSD, nor substance use, nor other causes. Addiction, as a concept, implies an intense feeling of acute pleasure, followed by a wish to repeat, and, often, tolerance and withdrawal. In this context, tolerance would mean that the more one experienced sex, the less pleasurable it would be; and withdrawal would mean that when abstinence occurred, one experienced painful psychological or physical symptoms (perhaps depression and anxiety).

Addiction also implies something that perhaps begins as an experiment, later becomes a habit, and then becomes autonomous. Neurobiologically, addictions tend to involve, we think, activation of the dopaminergic pleasure centers of the brain. Can lots of sex take on this pattern?

It seems difficult to me to distinguish OCD from so-called sexual addiction; perhaps the main difference would be that the individual is bothered by his behavior in one case (OCD) and not the other (addiction); yet this single minor subjective difference would seem to be a small feature upon which to base an entire diagnostic entity.

Indeed, there appear to exist many cases of OCD without insight, that is, OCD in which the patient is not much bothered by his or her symptoms. OCD is not, traditional teaching notwithstanding, uniformly characterized by presence of insight (better phrasing than the old ego-dystonic term, in my view).

One reputable website defines sexual addiction as “a progressive intimacy disorder characterized by compulsive sexual thoughts and acts.” DSM’s definition, under paraphilias, as sexual disorders NOS includes the following ideas: “compulsive searching for multiple partners, compulsive fixation on an unattainable partner, compulsive masturbation, compulsive love relationships and compulsive sexuality in a relationship.” This kind of definition seems quite hard to distinguish from OCD with sexual content.

Kari Ann Peniche - Playboy Model

Kari Ann Peniche - Playboy Model

The difference in terminology is important; the idea of sexual addiction would seem to imply analogies to substance abuse: 12 step programs, a limited role for medications, Malibu resorts. The OCD concept would put medications central to the treatment, and make the problem more biological in origin and pathogenesis, rather than simply habit gone awry.

Where we are uncertain, I would prefer the term sexual paraphilia, so as to remain neutral as to the addiction versus OCD dichotomy. Dr. Martin Kafka, a specialist in paraphilias, with whom I have shared patients and whose expertise is large, recently suggested a new DSM category of “Hypersexual disorder”, which presumes carefully first ruling out other conditions like OCD and bipolar disorder hierarchically.

Though I know he practices this way, I fear that the public at large, and the average clinician, will be too democratic, and too little hierarchical, and forget that such a diagnosis, though perhaps not useless, is one of exclusion, and last resort.

If individuals like Tiger Woods have a variety of OCD, it could be that enough serotonergic antidepressant would knock out their libido or their OCD, or both, to keep them from ruining their lives. But 12 step programs might be tenuously utile.

I don’t know the right answer, but it seems to me that this is yet another part of psychiatry where the lapidary use of popular phrases hardly clarifies.



4 Responses to “The Validity of “Sexual Addiction””

  1. DyNama says:

    I’m just an amateur but I’m wondering why this is even considered a disease. Is it only because society as a whole condemns the behavior, even though a significant number of men secretly applaud and are jealous of it, and others brag about doing it?

    I think several athletes and rockers have boasted about the number of women they’ve slept with, numbering in the tens of thousands. Do they have a disorder that needs treatment?

    Is the ultimate goal of treatment a committed relationship, or monogamy?

  2. Loren A. Olson M.D. says:

    You have offered some interesting comments. Here is a link to another article which speaks to your point, Too Much Sex? No Such Thing — Why Sex Addiction Is Total B.S.
    The reason I have chosen to publish what someone else has written rather than to write my own essay is that I am still on the fence about this issue.

    On the one hand, I do believe that some are so obsessed with sex, that they put the rest of their life on hold to pursue, mostly meaningless, sexual encounters. From a psychological perspective, there seems to be something wrong with that. I have a hard time labeling it an addiction, but would look more to issues of emptiness, loneliness, difficulty in connecting with people.

    Seeking pleasure through sex, creates a dopamine surge, which some people seem almost addicted to, whether it’s extreme sports, gambling, sex or almost anything people seem compelled to to do.

    So many things in our society become commercialized, including things like reparative therapies for homosexuality, and I certainly think that is true with sexual addiction. Someone high profile gets into trouble, and off they go to (very expensive) rehab. Shame and guilt are removed in the process, at least publicly. I also must add that I have had almost no involvement with these treatment centers, so I cannot offer an objective opinion about it.

    I think that anyone who is in a possition of power and affluence has people who are attracted to them. There seems to be a kind of mutual exploitation of each other. The relationship can be over-romantacized and unrealistic, and when it falls apart, vengance comes to the fore.

    I will be writing more about this in my book. I’m interested in hearing a lot more from everyone about this controverial subject.

    Loren Olson

  3. I’ve always told people it had to be true. Thanks for shedding light on this.

  4. Oh..wonderfull post and great information …will have a try all the tips..thanks…

Leave a Reply